Based in London, SumUp serves 1.5 million companies internationally with its helpful mPOS app and a card reader that supports magstripe, EMV (chip cards), and NFC (contactless) payments all in one (SumUp likewise provides a 3G card reader with an integrated SIM card, but just in Europe). There are a couple of functions you’ll need to get in touch with SumUp to trigger, due to the fact that you can’t do it from within the app itself(tipping, for example), and SumUp works just somewhat various from a lot of other mPOS apps. What might be a deal-breaker is the absence of keyed entry in the SumUp app. By contrast, SumUp provides simply one reader (in the United States, anyway): an all-in-one gadget called the SumUp Air. Ultimately though, Square stands out in terms of functions as well as hardware alternatives
, and that’s why in the end I have to declare Square the winner in the Square vs. SumUp debateDispute
What might be a deal-breaker is the lack of keyed entry in the SumUp app. If the card will not swipe, the chip malfunctions, or the NFC includes will not work, there isn’t a manual override. Again, I believe this mainly originates from SumUp’s roots in Europe, though I do hope that this limitation might vanish in the future. For now, the closest approximation is SumUp’s SMS payments feature. If you do not have access to a card reader, however your consumers have their phones, you can send them a link in a text (SMS). That will direct them to a site where they can enter their payment info.
all services utilizing SumUp will certify. Both services use a virtual terminal for no monthly cost, however with both business, you’ll pay a bit more than you would for a transaction in the mobile app. Both do offer eCommerce capabilities, though Square’s is far more comprehensive, with a domain name, a free website, shopping cart combinations, and an API. SumUp’s is simply an API.
That said, SumUp does use one service that Square does not: worldwide processing. Granted, this is restricted to the 31 countries SumUp currently runs in. If you are heading to a trade show, convention, or another occasion in the UK, France, Germany, Ireland, Chile, Brazil, or one of the other nations in which SumUp currently operates, you can call the business and ask them to enable your account to procedure transactions abroad. Not too worn-out, considering most United States services do not even come close to offering this capability.
In 2018, SumUp launched a 3G card reader in the European market. It’s a standalone gadget that doesn’t require tethering to a smartphone with the SumUp app, which is undeniably cool. It does not link to invoice printers like the standard card reader does, nor does it support integration with POS systems. Furthermore, the device can not connect to Wi-Fi. The 3G reader has actually not been released in the US.
If you’re only a mobile business, you likely have no usage for all the bells and whistles. Square is the clear winner if you want to run a countertop system and a mobile one at the very same time. For merchants who simply desire mobile processing, I honestly think you’ll be served quite well by either of these options. With discounts and invoicing, Square’s mPOS app is just that little bit more robust than that of SumUp.
Please note that just in the US and UK can merchants actually select between these 2 processors. If you’re in Europe (outside the UK), Brazil, or Chile, just SumUp is offered to you. If you’re in Canada, Australia, or Japan, Square is an option for you, but not SumUp.
Charges & & Rates Winner: SumUp For basic transactions, Square and SumUp as soon as had a similar rate: 2.75%. Square recently changed its rate for swiped, dipped, and contactless transactions to 2.6 %+$0.10 per deal. That may not appear like a big modification, but for merchants with a high deal volume but low typical deal worth( coffee stores, for instance), this modification means more money paid in charges. Furthermore, SumUp has decreased its rate to 2.65%. These changes imply SumUp gets a narrow win in this category. On the whole, however, rates for Square vs. SumUp is quite
comparable, which is nice. Neither requires any regular monthly charges or minimum processing amounts. You only pay for what you utilize, which is why processors like this are great for brand-new merchants, mobile services, and those that just process rarely. I’ve personally written a lot about the cost of using Square. For context into both Square and SumUp’s
pricing schemes and how they compare to, say, an interchange-plus strategy, I advise taking a look at our analysis short article: Is Square the Cheapest Processor for Your Business? With Square, you’re going to pay among 3 costs: 2.6%+$0.10: For all swiped, dipped, or contactless transactions in the Point
of Sale app 2.9 %+$0.30: For all eCommerce deals and invoices
3.5% + $0.15: For all virtual terminal and keyed-in deals Square means it when the
business states”No other fees”– it’s even started waiving the chargeback cost
, which is unusual in the payments market. SumUp has 2 rates depending upon the type
of transaction: 2.65%: For all swiped, dipped, or contactless deals in the SumUp app 2.9 %+$0.15: For all virtual terminal or SMS payments transactions
There’s also a$10 charge used to chargebacks. Nevertheless, there are
no other charges. SumUp in fact uses better prices than Square on its extra services. SumUp doesn’t have an invoicing capability at all, making that
a moot point, much to my dismay. All things thought about, I’m
giving SumUp a slight minor here. Obviously, private scenarios matter– a coffee store might save money on processing with SumUp, while a business with a low deal volume however high average transaction value might conserve a little with Square. More companies fit the former description than the latter. Sales & Advertising Transparency Winner: Tie With both business requiring no agreement, no monthly costs, and no month-to-month minimum on top of their clear pricing strategy, it’s easy to state SumUp matches Square perfectly in the sales and advertising transparency.
Both are third-party processors with a small intrinsic threat of account
termination, however they overall seem to be very steady. That said, if you want some coaching and tools to better manage your organisation, Square definitely outshines SumUp worrying informative resources. The Townsquare blog is a fantastic resource for all sorts of business-related topics, from payroll to marketing. And while SumUp’s United States website now includes a blog
, it’s a bit lighter on product information, and unlike with Square’s blog, you can’t filter the posts you see by topic or organisation type. Contract Length & Cancellation Winner: Tie With both Square and SumUp, there are no agreements to sign, no month-to-month fees, no ETFs, no inactivity fees, and no cancellation costs. Both business are equal in this regard. Client Service & Technical Support Winner: Tie I’ll be truthful: Square does get a bad rap for
customer service &. The majority of that,
I think, originates from the way it manages account terminations. If Square closes your account, it will shut you down by means of email, with no factor provided, and no possibility of appeal. If you are just handling
a hold or a freeze, there’s a bit more
a long time, Square likewise got a lot of sorrow for its lack of phone support. A number of years ago, it lastly included phone support, but with a caveat: first, you need to get a code to be able to call in. This continues to provide frustration from merchants who have account difficulties,
but others seem fine with it. Square likewise provides Twitter assistance, a ticket-based system, a very extensive self-service understanding base, and even a community online forum. All of this seems pretty enough. Like I said simply a minute earlier, the majority of the complaints about Square’s service seem to extend specifically to account terminations
and holds instead of unhelpful customer support reps or perhaps reaction times. SumUp does not have a community online forum, but it does have phone support, a ticket-based support group, and a relatively extensive understanding base. It likewise has phone support and, unlike Square, you don’t need to obtain a customer code to call in. Additionally, while SumUp does have a Twitter represent client support(
@ sumup), the concerns asked of it– and the responses provided– seem primarily to be specific to the European market. I have not found a fantastic many complaints about SumUp’s customer care. I will state that my personal experiences with SumUp’s client support have actually been excellent which the chatter on Google Play is primarily positive. The company is even responding to some reviews with tech support. I’m going to call this one a draw. Square has a larger selection of assistance alternatives, however SumUp has cut through some of the red tape by not needing a customer code for its phone assistance. User Reviews Winner: Tie It’s typically tough to call a winner in this classification. How do you truly decide who comes out on top when comparing user viewpoint as expressed on disparate sites and comment sections throughout the internet
? Who has less grievances? Whose problems are less regularly dreadful? Who gets the most gushing praise? My technique type of fluctuates depending on who I’m discussing since context absolutely matters.
Based on the research I
‘ve done, my
gut states that it’s really a draw in this category. Unfavorable Reviews & Complaints This comparison handles one service that is huge in the US and another that’s still quite little in the States but has a larger following abroad. We do not have difficult numbers for either, and judging by problem volume, even adjusted for relative size, is challenging. This time I’m looking more at material. SumUp and Square grievances have lots of similarities:
there are a handful of problems about customer care, a handful about account terminations, a periodic complaint about glitchy hardware. Square’s most significant source of grievances is terminations, without question. Individuals tend not to like their accounts being ended, which is entirely easy to understand. But I believe part of the aggravation comes from how the business manages terminations: a simple email, without any factor, no appeal, and no possibility to reach anyone on
the phone. SumUp has far less grievances overall, but, once again, it has a smaller sized consumer base, especially in the US. Account terminations are a large piece of them, simply as with Square. I’ve also noticed a current rise of complaints relating to Bluetooth connectivity problems with the card reader. Ideally, this will prove to be a momentary problem– and I’ll note that SumUp has been reacting to user problems on the matter. Positive Reviews & Testimonials Square is a media darling, to be sure. Which’s not to mention its different partnerships or the implicit appreciation offered by a merchant’s continuing use of the service. SumUp is smaller sized, however it’s developed some collaborations throughout Europe already. It has a smaller sized customer base, however I see the exact same sort of positive reviews I see from Square users. With both Square and SumUp, customers like how simple it is to get registered. They like the instinctive app and the easy-to-use hardware. That’s all it comes down to. Last Verdict Winner: Square I said it before, but it’s worth duplicating: Square and SumUp are really comparable at the heart of things. Basically, whereas Square has a very American”let’s attempt a little whatever!” mindset, SumUp is leaner and more selective. Nonetheless, in the end, the household similarity is still noticeably clear. There are a great deal of methods which Square and SumUp are on level footing. Ultimately though, Square stands apart in terms of functions in addition to hardware options
, and that’s why in the end I have to state Square the winner in the Square vs. SumUp dispute. Square can adjust easily to countertop and mobile environments, it has more features(specifically concerning inventory), and a terrific variety of compatible hardware you can purchase straight. SumUp is an extremely capable mobile app, however it can’t do counter top. It doesn’t support invoicing, and its eCommerce assistance is limited strictly to an API. That’s not a bad thing. It just suggests that SumUp is actually suggested to be primarily a mobile processing app, whereas Square can be a whole environment for your business. If
you need whatever, that’s terrific. Square will serve you well. , if you simply need a mobile option, either option will work just fine. Thanks for reading! Keep in mind to take a look at our full SumUp and Square evaluations for more in-depth evaluations of each service. You might also wish to look at our leading Square options and our mobile payments comparison chart as well!
Square SumUp ✓ Products & Services
Charges & Rates ✓ Tie Sales & Advertising Transparency
While SumUp runs in 31 countries— almost all of Europe, the United States, Brazil, and Chile– Square operates just in the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia, and the UK.
Ultimately, nevertheless, they’re related– and by that, I imply both are mobile POS apps that let practically anyone take payments anywhere they can get wi-fi or data. It’s reasonable to state that Square has much more going on than SumUp, what with its retail-focused app and numerous add-on services. But if you’re just looking at mobile processing– taking payments on a smartphone or a tablet– which is the better alternative? This is the method this article takes– we’re comparing the two companies on the basis of their mobile processing apps, not the other services.
Square’s current rate modification for standard deals (from 2.75% to 2.6% + $0.10 per deal) has a lot of small companies unhappy, as the repaired 10-cent charge indicates that organisations with a high deal volume but low average transaction worth stand to pay more in charges. Does this create an opening for SumUp in the United States market?
Let’s compare and contrast Square vs. SumUp to see how the two mobile payment processors stack up.